Here is a compilation of comments by a person calling himself DisqusX. I finally seem to have quieted him by telling him (sort of) how much he is loved and respected. I suppose that was not the response he has been looking for. I'm waiting to see what his next move will be.
Another
old lady who got the gas pedal confused with the brake, just like all the
other cases...
|
Yep another idiot who got the gas pedal
confused with the brake.
|
Keep drinking the crazy juice, moron.
|
You're clearly unstable and can't accept
the truth.
|
You've taken the short bus to crazy-town
long ago
|
Your little head must be spinning....
|
the moderators
don't like gratuitous self-promotion of junk science
|
Looks like nobody's listening to your
garbage.
|
Ignoramus, have you read any other report besides the fraud Barr's?
|
A few "slow" people may buy into
your drivel, but the majority do not.
|
your error-prone and self-congratulatory
post..
|
most rational people will trust the actual
facts from the folks who engineered the vehicle
|
The actual factual results from folks not
paid for by plaintiff's attorneys are right here.
|
When you start supposedly factual sentences
(that aren't) with, "In my opinion..." it takes away from whatever little
credibility you may have.
|
No need for your opinions.
|
He’s as dumb as you, Ignoramus.
|
He's also paid for by scumbag, greedy
plaintiffs’ attorneys
|
The quote in my comment above is pretty
solid.
|
The fact that you're nuts indicates that
you aren't playing with a full deck.
|
Please, for the safety of others, turn in
your car keys!
|
Don't forget your crazy pills tonight!
|
Toyota should sue you for defamation.
|
Stupidity should be illegal
|
Desperation stinks, Ignoramus.
|
Wikipedia is nice isn't it?
|
How much are the shyster lawyers paying you?
|
EE times, embedded gurus, and whatever
other garbage you cited is only useful for birdcage lining [1]
|
you seem like you have a habit of ignoring
relevant facts and replacing them with fantasy. By process of elimination,
that leaves DUN DUN DUNNNNN: driver error.
|
You guys are too much fun!
|
More fear-mongering garbage from X and his
inept cronies.
|
We know who you are, and you have ZERO
credibility.
|
I couldn't make it even half-way through
your lunatic rant.
|
Just because you ignore the facts and
don't know what you're talking about doesn't mean ya gotta cry about it.
|
Regarding your question of can EDR data be relied upon: Yes, NHTSA,
among others, has put this fear-mongering theory to bed long ago
|
It helps to have facts
|
Maybe you should do some research before commenting on things you
don't understand. This is fun, let's keep going...
|
Can you even explain how an ETC works? Let's start with an easier
question: can you tell us what ETCS-I stands for?
|
You didn't comment on the size of the floor mat because you seem like
you have a habit of ignoring relevant facts and replacing them with fantasy.
By process of elimination, that leaves DUN DUN DUNNNNN: driver error. You
guys are too much fun!
|
More fear-mongering garbage from Y and his inept cronies..
|
You clearly are no software engineer. I'm sure the millions of Toyota
drivers that have had zero problems with their vehicles are quaking in their
boots.
|
Let's forget for a moment all of the overwhelming scientific evidence
that you've inexplicably chosen to ignore and that runs contrary to your
misguided theory.
|
Let's put the multiple, independent, thorough engineering studies
that found no defects aside for a moment.
|
Let's entertain your little conspiracy theory for a moment and see if
you can answer a few seemingly simple questions, shall we?
|
Why doesn't this "defect" of yours affect manual
transmission cars?
|
Why does this "defect" predominantly affect older, female
drivers? Perhaps this "defect" knows how to discriminate against
old ladies? Or maybe, just maybe, old people don't have the reflexes and
spacial awareness they had when they were younger.
|
How is it that most of the "victims" of this
"defect" are located in the United States?
|
After all the extortion attempts (including that big DOJ extortion
that still found no defect in the cars), trials, frivolous lawsuits, media
speculation, fear-mongering, congressional hearings, overkill-recalls (that
would not have been considered "recall-able defects" just a few
short years ago), and just basically having the company's reputation dragged
through the mud, what possible, plausible reason does Toyota have for not
fixing the "real problem"?
|
Why would they go through what they've been through and deliberately
choose to not fix the "defect"?
|
Why would NHTSA and NASA lie about the findings of their thorough,
respective studies? What's in it for them?
|
How did all these engineers decide to trick us all and spend all that
time and money on the wrong fix?
|
Perhaps you can explain how an Electronic Throttle Control system
works and how this "defect" not only made it through the multiple,
independent failsafes undetected AND simultaneously made the braking system
of these cars inoperable
|
(all cars, no matter the make, are engineered so that the brakes overpower
the engine, even an engine at wide-open throttle)?
|
There's a principle known as Ockham's razor stating that the simplest
solution with the fewest assumptions and variables is almost always the right
one. In this case, driver error is the right one.
|
You can't and won't convince me of your fear-mongering, erroneous,
disproven theory. It sounds like you're trying to convince yourself and
others though.
|
Fortunately, the vast majority of people along with Toyota have moved
on, and brainwashed folks like yourself are few and far between and won't
slow down this company one bit.
|
I won't be sucked in by you or your kind who have no idea what you're
talking about. But I can agree to disagree. Can you?
|
Y to X:
I love how these people avoid answering your questions. Just shows how little
they know.
X to Y
:I know. I should really stop using them for entertainment and go do
something productive...
|
Wow, you really have no idea how cars work. What you
just said about brakes is dumber than a bag of door knobs....
|
The truth hurts sometimes, doesn't it? I used to think
people who ignore hard facts were anti-social trolls too, but increasingly
I'm inclined to believe they are paid for by plaintiff's attorneys with
ulterior motives--just like Barr was...
|
I used to think people who ignore hard facts were
anti-social trolls too, but increasingly I'm inclined to believe they are
paid for by plaintiff's attorneys with ulterior motives--just like Barr
was...
|
He's right. There indeed is no evidence of the gibberish
you speak of. It's been backed up many times by actual scientists and
engineers.
|
Your comprehension skills are lacking. Brakes over
power an engine even without brake override (which I doubt you understand how
that even works).
|
Convincing a jury of something is not the same as the
truth. But if that's what you base your conclusion on, Toyota still wins as
they've won all trials but the Oklahoma one that have been decided by a jury.
|
The brakes do slow down the car--the trick is that you
have to actually APPLY them.
|
Surprisingly, some people just don't understand that.
It seems every time something is made idiot proof, the world just creates a
better idiot...
|
anyone reading Barr's garbage (who was paid for by the
shyster lawyers) will see he simply manipulated a car to do what he wanted
and in no way represents anything a car would experience in the real world.
|
I'm guessing you were disappointed that the Easter
bunny didn't actually show up yesterday, since you believe in imaginary
things. ……Yes, millions of people continue to drive these cars WITH NO
PROBLEMS WHATSOEVER.
|
Your argument is based on someone paid for by
plaintiff's lawyers who admitted to introducing external software to a car,
and that car still always triggered failsafe systems, which is why most
rational people don't buy into his crap.
|
Yep, that software is so evil it knows how to target
little old ladies...
|
[1] Question:
Are the gurus embedded in the EE times
or in garbage, or within both and then processed for use as birdcage lining?
Another
old lady who got the gas pedal confused with the brake, just like all the
other cases...
|
Yep another idiot who got the gas pedal
confused with the brake.
|
Keep drinking the crazy juice, moron.
|
You're clearly unstable and can't accept
the truth.
|
You've taken the short bus to crazy-town
long ago
|
Your little head must be spinning....
|
the moderators
don't like gratuitous self-promotion of junk science
|
Looks like nobody's listening to your
garbage.
|
Ignoramus, have you read any other report besides the fraud Barr's?
|
A few "slow" people may buy into
your drivel, but the majority do not.
|
your error-prone and self-congratulatory
post..
|
most rational people will trust the actual
facts from the folks who engineered the vehicle
|
The actual factual results from folks not
paid for by plaintiff's attorneys are right here.
|
When you start supposedly factual sentences
(that aren't) with, "In my opinion..." it takes away from whatever little
credibility you may have.
|
No need for your opinions.
|
He’s as dumb as you, Ignoramus.
|
He's also paid for by scumbag, greedy
plaintiffs’ attorneys
|
The quote in my comment above is pretty
solid.
|
The fact that you're nuts indicates that
you aren't playing with a full deck.
|
Please, for the safety of others, turn in
your car keys!
|
Don't forget your crazy pills tonight!
|
Toyota should sue you for defamation.
|
Stupidity should be illegal
|
Desperation stinks, Ignoramus.
|
Wikipedia is nice isn't it?
|
How much are the shyster lawyers paying you?
|
EE times, embedded gurus, and whatever
other garbage you cited is only useful for birdcage lining [1]
|
you seem like you have a habit of ignoring
relevant facts and replacing them with fantasy. By process of elimination,
that leaves DUN DUN DUNNNNN: driver error.
|
You guys are too much fun!
|
More fear-mongering garbage from X and his
inept cronies.
|
We know who you are, and you have ZERO
credibility.
|
I couldn't make it even half-way through
your lunatic rant.
|
Just because you ignore the facts and
don't know what you're talking about doesn't mean ya gotta cry about it.
|
Regarding your question of can EDR data be relied upon: Yes, NHTSA,
among others, has put this fear-mongering theory to bed long ago
|
It helps to have facts
|
Maybe you should do some research before commenting on things you
don't understand. This is fun, let's keep going...
|
Can you even explain how an ETC works? Let's start with an easier
question: can you tell us what ETCS-I stands for?
|
You didn't comment on the size of the floor mat because you seem like
you have a habit of ignoring relevant facts and replacing them with fantasy.
By process of elimination, that leaves DUN DUN DUNNNNN: driver error. You
guys are too much fun!
|
More fear-mongering garbage from Y and his inept cronies..
|
You clearly are no software engineer. I'm sure the millions of Toyota
drivers that have had zero problems with their vehicles are quaking in their
boots.
|
Let's forget for a moment all of the overwhelming scientific evidence
that you've inexplicably chosen to ignore and that runs contrary to your
misguided theory.
|
Let's put the multiple, independent, thorough engineering studies
that found no defects aside for a moment.
|
Let's entertain your little conspiracy theory for a moment and see if
you can answer a few seemingly simple questions, shall we?
|
Why doesn't this "defect" of yours affect manual
transmission cars?
|
Why does this "defect" predominantly affect older, female
drivers? Perhaps this "defect" knows how to discriminate against
old ladies? Or maybe, just maybe, old people don't have the reflexes and
spacial awareness they had when they were younger.
|
How is it that most of the "victims" of this
"defect" are located in the United States?
|
After all the extortion attempts (including that big DOJ extortion
that still found no defect in the cars), trials, frivolous lawsuits, media
speculation, fear-mongering, congressional hearings, overkill-recalls (that
would not have been considered "recall-able defects" just a few
short years ago), and just basically having the company's reputation dragged
through the mud, what possible, plausible reason does Toyota have for not
fixing the "real problem"?
|
Why would they go through what they've been through and deliberately
choose to not fix the "defect"?
|
Why would NHTSA and NASA lie about the findings of their thorough,
respective studies? What's in it for them?
|
How did all these engineers decide to trick us all and spend all that
time and money on the wrong fix?
|
Perhaps you can explain how an Electronic Throttle Control system
works and how this "defect" not only made it through the multiple,
independent failsafes undetected AND simultaneously made the braking system
of these cars inoperable
|
(all cars, no matter the make, are engineered so that the brakes overpower
the engine, even an engine at wide-open throttle)?
|
There's a principle known as Ockham's razor stating that the simplest
solution with the fewest assumptions and variables is almost always the right
one. In this case, driver error is the right one.
|
You can't and won't convince me of your fear-mongering, erroneous,
disproven theory. It sounds like you're trying to convince yourself and
others though.
|
Fortunately, the vast majority of people along with Toyota have moved
on, and brainwashed folks like yourself are few and far between and won't
slow down this company one bit.
|
I won't be sucked in by you or your kind who have no idea what you're
talking about. But I can agree to disagree. Can you?
|
Y to X:
I love how these people avoid answering your questions. Just shows how little
they know.
X to Y
:I know. I should really stop using them for entertainment and go do
something productive...
|
Wow, you really have no idea how cars work. What you
just said about brakes is dumber than a bag of door knobs....
|
The truth hurts sometimes, doesn't it? I used to think
people who ignore hard facts were anti-social trolls too, but increasingly
I'm inclined to believe they are paid for by plaintiff's attorneys with
ulterior motives--just like Barr was...
|
I used to think people who ignore hard facts were
anti-social trolls too, but increasingly I'm inclined to believe they are
paid for by plaintiff's attorneys with ulterior motives--just like Barr
was...
|
He's right. There indeed is no evidence of the gibberish
you speak of. It's been backed up many times by actual scientists and
engineers.
|
Your comprehension skills are lacking. Brakes over
power an engine even without brake override (which I doubt you understand how
that even works).
|
Convincing a jury of something is not the same as the
truth. But if that's what you base your conclusion on, Toyota still wins as
they've won all trials but the Oklahoma one that have been decided by a jury.
|
The brakes do slow down the car--the trick is that you
have to actually APPLY them.
|
Surprisingly, some people just don't understand that.
It seems every time something is made idiot proof, the world just creates a
better idiot...
|
anyone reading Barr's garbage (who was paid for by the
shyster lawyers) will see he simply manipulated a car to do what he wanted
and in no way represents anything a car would experience in the real world.
|
I'm guessing you were disappointed that the Easter
bunny didn't actually show up yesterday, since you believe in imaginary
things. ……Yes, millions of people continue to drive these cars WITH NO
PROBLEMS WHATSOEVER.
|
Your argument is based on someone paid for by
plaintiff's lawyers who admitted to introducing external software to a car,
and that car still always triggered failsafe systems, which is why most
rational people don't buy into his crap.
|
Yep, that software is so evil it knows how to target
little old ladies...
|
[1] Question:
Are the gurus embedded in the EE times
or in garbage, or within both and then processed for use as birdcage lining?
.jpg)
